As long as the enchantment survived, Voldemort could not kill Harry. But other people can kill Harry. So it was essential to have Voldemort kill Harry. Because Dumbledore knew that Voldemort would make himself weak by killing Harry, as he knew that Harry wouldn't be truly dead because Voldemort would have killed one of his horcruxes, which really is not Harry but Voldemort himself, narrowing it down, a piece of Voldemort was living inside of Harry as a shield against the final "Avada Kedavra" Voldemort would use to kill Harry, Dumbledore knew that Voldemort will have technically saved Harry's Life.
Also to answer "why" Voldemort had to be the one? Originally Harry's mother created the protection by willingly sacrificing herself out of pure love and devotion - fully sacrificing herself, not simply defending Harry. Resulting in Voldemort not being able to harm Harry in any way. When Voldemort used the killing curse on Harry it reflected on himself, destroying his body BUT also breaking a part of his soul off at the same time which latched onto Harry's soul.
Harry in function became another horcrux for Voldemort. When Voldemort used Harry's blood for his resurrection it was to 'nullify' the protection granted to Harry by his mothers sacrifice Goblet of fire. It allowed him to touch and harm Harry but what saved Harry on that occasion, was the cores of their wands were the same and had a special connection.
Which resulted in Voldemort's wand regurgitating his spells e. Harry forced Voldemort's spell back when the wands connected and the people Voldemort had killed begun coming out of his wand.
A side effect that Voldemort didn't realise is that he had in essence become a type of anchor for Harry's soul - functioning similar to a Horcrux for Harry but without the soul mutilation. While Voldemort lived, Harry could not die - I believed it was a blanket protection as well, not just specific to Voldemort killing Harry but now that I read your question it seems that it must have been ONLY Voldemort that could no longer kill Harry but that doesn't make sense based on the wording.
Perhaps it was that Dumbledore knew Harry would willingly sacrifice himself but ONLY to Voldemort because that's who Harry knew he really needed to protect his friends from.
Than in the forest when Harry willingly sacrificed himself for his friends out of pure love and devotion, he provided the same type of protection for them that his mother provided for him when he was an infant - although seperate from his mothers protection The Deathly Hallows. At the same time that Voldemort used the killing curse on Harry, he killed the part of his soul residing in Harry and actually did succeed in killing Harry but because Harry's blood lived on in Voldemort, Harry could choose to not pass over.
He in truth had nullified the protection granted by his mothers sacrifice but had created an entirely new problem when he took Harry's blood - it wouldn't apply to a simple blood transfusion I believe but only to a total resurrection of a persons body.
Later on in the final duel, the people Harry had sacrificed himself for were offered a level of protection against the people Harry had died to protect them from aka Voldemort and his followers. Voldemort still could not kill Harry and when their spells collided because Harry was the true master of the incredibly powerful elder wand, the wand was able to overcome the raw power of its master - it sided with Harry when it recognised that the person who Voldemort was duelling, was indeed its true master - resulting in Voldemort's own curse being reflected onto himself.
Because all the other fragments of Voldemort's soul had been destroyed, there was no longer anything to protect him from death. Dumbledore had always intended for this to be the eventual outcome because it was the only way, well maybe except the part of Harry not dying but I think that was what he hoped would happen.
I'm still not convinced based on what Dumbledore said in Harry's vision that it had to be Voldemort but I can't say the book is wrong, simply that it doesn't make sense if you take Dumbledore's words at face value - that's if my understanding of the the process is correct. The deathly hallows were almost certainly wizard creations and not all powerful. I don't think they had anything to do with Harry surviving the killing curse in the forest.
As a side note - in case it was mentioned - the protection granted by Harry's relatives was linked to his mothers sacrifice but still separate, so while it only lasted until he came of age, his mothers protection would be until his death.
This is of course my own opinion and it's truly to much effort to find quotes substantiating what I have written, so make of it what you will and I'm well aware I answered much more than the original question but based on the other comments I thought I would put in my two cents. Horcruxes in living things die when the host dies nagini. As for why Harry had to die by Voldemort's hand I am not certain, but it is important to note a few things about Harry's "death". This is a possible answer: Harry had to die by Voldemort's hand because of the prohacy.
Neither can live while the other survives. Voldemort could not use the horcrux in Harry as long as Harry lived. So perhaps Voldemort had to be the one to kill Harry so that Harry could live.
I personally think Jo intended to kill Harry in one epic final battle but her publishers refused so he was allowed to come back. This is plausible for a few reasons. Harry was master of the elder wand and all 3 deathly hallows, making Harry master of death, when Voldemort tried to kill him in the forest. Harry had the choice to come back because Voldemort tried to kill Harry with a wand that belonged to Harry. Maybe you cannot be killed by your own wand or since 2 souls resided in Harry's body only one soul had to die and the weaker one, a partial soul Voldemort's , and not the owner of the wand, did.
Dombledore intended to have the power of the elder wand end with him as no one had disarmed him before he died, He had asked Snape to kill him giving him a better death than the curse in his hand would so Snape killing him would not have transferred the ownership of the elder wand to Snape. His plan was foiled because Draco disarmed him before Snape killed him. When Harry puts the wand back in Dombledore's tomb after fixing his old wand the power of the elder wand will end with Harry.
Harry was the only one that could defeat Voldemort. It was possible for Neville to have been the one with the power to defeat the dark lord but Voldemort ensured that it was to be Harry when he tried to kill him as a baby and the curse rebounded killing Vildemort's body and a piece of his soul attaching to Harry.
That night Harry was marked the scar as Voldemort's equal and from that point on it could only be Harry. I think the reason that voldemort had to be the one to kill harry is because the prophecy clearly states "either must die at the other ones hand", which is interpreted to mean that one has to kill the other. Since Harry must die, because he's a horcrux, he can't be the one to kill voldemort.
So in order for the prophecy to come true and in order for the Dark Lord to be vanquished, Voldemort has to be the one to kill harry. And that's why Dumbledore says that it is 'essential' for Voldemort to be the one to kill Harry. If an "avada kedavra" by anyone could simply destroy a Horcrux then why Dumbledore worked so hard to find a way for destroying the ring?
Don't tell me Dumbledore looked on the ethics while destroying Horcrux. Horcrux is a living thing because it has a soul. An "avada kedavra" spell is supposed to destroy the living things. But there are exceptions like Phoenix birds. Horcrux have mystical power like Phoenix to survive attacks. I think it would be more easy for the creator to destroy the Horcrux than anyone else. If somebody other than Voldemort cast the "avada kedavra" on Harry and if it goes unaffected then Voldemort would certainly know something is not right.
Before Voldemort took Harry's blood, he could not even touch him, and presumably, his 'avada' against Harry were ineffective. But after he took the blood, he had a hook into Harry's protection, so he could try to kill him and send the part of himself stuck to Harry across the veil.
Children are naturally curious, so words like this could tempt them to check out the third floor corridor. This is especially so for those prone to being troublemakers such as Fred and George Weasley. I mean, what if he never said anything? What if he just kept quiet about it? Dumbledore explained that he decided to leave Harry with Vernon, Petunia, and Dudley Dursley because of the blood wards.
I talk more about this here and here. He was already right there in front of their house. Harry was on that doorstep until the next morning when Petunia discovered him while bringing out the milk bottles for the milkman. This was grossly negligent of Dumbledore, McGonagall and Hagrid.
The weather forecast even predicted a rainy night. Did we ever find out what he wrote in the letter with Harry that induced Petunia to accept him?
As a parent, I am fucking horrified that someone left a child. A child!! Out on a doorstep all night. Harry was over the age of 1. My daughter was walking at 9 months. They left a fucking child who was possibly probably walking out on a doorstep with no fucking supervision all fucking night. As an adult, I hate Albus Dumbledore for this. This is so grossly negligent that it would get him prosecuted in courts.
Think about that. He did sooo many questionable things, but this thing, had anyone known about it, would have gotten him fucking jail time. Fuck Albus Dumbledore. He was already right there in front of the house. Why bother with a letter instead of speaking to them in person?
What if the Dursleys have questions or something? Minerva McGonagall could and should have said something. After all, she already expressed doubt about leaving Harry with the Dursleys. Could Voldemort have killed Harry with Muggle weapons?
Dumbledore's knowledge about the Chosen One didn't stop Voldemort from killing Harry's parents, nor the wrongful incarceration of Sirius Black. And so I made my decision. Harry was just a baby , but he survived the attack. Voldemort disappeared after When Voldemort and Harry duelled their final match, the wand used by Voldemort called the Elder Wand was actually Harry's. The Killing Curse rebounded on Voldemort, hence finally killing him.. Voldemort to the Death Eaters: "Sorry guys, I couldn't kill that one kid with with magic.
He couldn't have cared less if James and Harry had ended up dead but couldn't stand the thought of Lily dying. However, when Voldemort the Lord is insecure after hearing the prophecy that he will be disposed of.
One thing Voldemort cannot understand is love. In this video, we're going to be discussing Harry, Dumbledore, Voldemort, and the epic du. I think that if he did kill Harry, there's a high chance he would use Harry's death to make another horcrux. Found inside — Page 82In the first episode, Voldemort's attempt to kill Harry as a boy was blocked by Lily Potter's intervention. Voldemort had sought to get Lily to step aside, He knew of Voldemort's efforts to steal the propehcy from the Ministry of Magic.
Instead he resumed with the task of petting the teen's hair. Harry says he has Is there a reason why Voldemort specifically tried to kill Harry using magic?
Could merfolk cook without air by using electrical heating. It was something we were all hoping for but honestly before the or. For this to work, Snape would have had to be vital to Voldemort's plans. Because he was wrong about Harry's protection as a baby being a fluke.
Voldemort did not intend to kill Lily, even giving her a chance to get out of the way as he moved to attack Harry; she could have lived and yet she chose to protect her son. In doing so, she unknowingly gave Harry a level of protection Voldemort couldn't touch.
Why don't Muggle-born wizards use Muggle technology to fight Death Eaters? When Harry was hit by the. He offered them a chance to move away and let him only take Harry's life. Also to know is, what caused Voldemort to die? Lily is a different matter, because Voldemort didn't intend to kill her at first at Snape's request. There are three neutral wires tied together, do I just add a fourth one from the switch? Words with a letter sound at the start but not the letter. He was wary of the situation, because he had already been through a time when Avada Kedavra backfired on him.
Voldemort assumed that even though Nagini is the one killing Snape, the order was his, and therefore nothing would go wrong. Found inside — Page Professor Quirrell didn't want to kill him. It was possible that Harry wastheonlypersonintheworldagainstwhomProfessorQuirrellwouldn't be able to use a I know that I am giving a lot away to people who have not read the book.
Found inside — Page 96He uses experiences that would have broken a less resilient person and turns them into tools that he can use in his quest to kill Voldemort. As such, Harry No, Harry — I fashioned myself a new name, a name I knew wizards everywhere would one day fear to speak, when I had become the greatest sorcerer in the world! Harry continued to have the protection of his mother's love and the protection of love in general and Voldemort was not able to stably possess Harry for long enough to get his plan to work.
So he busts out his wand, chuckles to himself as he says "This will be like taking life from a baby! Harry uses the same fang to destroy Tom Riddle 's diary, killing the memory preserved in it.
Best Answer. When James tried to protect his family, Voldemort eliminated him. I think you are right. He put it on, forgetting that the ring was now a Horcrux and thus cursed, thereby ruining his hand and causing his own eventual demise. He says that he never could have united the Hallows because he took the Cloak out of idle curiosity and the Stone for selfish reasons, wishing to disturb the peaceful dead. He only did the right thing with the Wand, having taken it to protect others from it.
Harry, on the other hand, only wanted each of these items for selfless reasons. Dumbledore concludes by explaining that he had counted on Hermione to slow Harry down somewhat during his quest, keeping him from rushing after the Hallows, so that Harry would not impulsively seize upon the Hallows for the wrong reasons.
0コメント