What is the difference between encoding and transcoding




















It's that simple. So does it matter? Not really, ultimately the terms are used interchangeably and if you've read this article you are likely the only person you know that knows the difference.

Want to learn how to improve your media management practices? Click below to speak with an expert today! Encoding vs. Decoding The difference between encoding and decoding is much more straightforward.

Video Encoder, Transcoder, and Decoder Options Niagara Video offers a full line of high-performance encoders and transcoders, including all-in-one units and portable options. Rackmount Products Rackmount products are premium, mounted products built for maximum performance and durability. The series offers cost-effective, high-density performance for multi-channel encoding and transcoding.

Featuring advanced Quicksync processing and high-performance hardware, the can support multiple simultaneous streams in a variety of formats and codecs, making it an ideal choice for live streaming, Simulcasting, Webcasting, Mobile TV and IPTV.

Based on reliable SCX encoding software, the series is a more cost-effective encoder, transcoder, and decoder unit with H. The series offers an impressive array of inputs, including SDI and analog sources, with support for older protocols such as Windows Media.

The is an economical, input-dense option for professional live capture, encoding, and streaming. Portable Products For ultimate flexibility, Niagara also offers a range of portable encoding and transcoding options. GoStream Encoders. GoStream portable encoders are efficient and reliable, offering both analog and digital input models with multiple output protocols.

Their compact bodies are still equipped with high-end processing equipment and intuitive front-panel controls to ensure maximum performance wherever you are. The B is a flexible and affordable option for professional first mile and backhaul applications, including broadcast and IP transport.

Niagara s. Often used in the context of encoders—which can be software or hardware based—encoding takes a live video source and converts it to a file, so it may be live streamed or archived in a digital format. A simple example of this would be taking a live camera feed from your onsite broadcast studio and encoding it to an Apple HLS live video for viewing on a mobile device over the internet or a MP4 file for playback as Video on Demand VOD.

Some examples of both old and new video encoding formats are as follows:. So with the above in mind. The good news is it does matter, and once you understand encoding, transcoding is actually a relatively simple concept. The process of transcoding involves taking a file in one of the digital formats and converting it to another digital format, size or bitrate.

Similarly, the process of transcoding involves—you guessed it—moving a video file from one format to another. Easy, right? One other important item to note is why transcoding is actually necessary.

So in order to deliver video to everyone in your organization who wishes to view it, you have no choice but to transcode and eventually deliver video in as many formats, resolutions and bitrates as needed. So when it comes to corporate video, both encoding and transcoding are critical concepts to understand when processing and sharing video across an enterprise.

And the good news is, the Qumu platform has all of the encoding processes necessary to bring any type of video feed into the platform, and all of the transcoding protocols necessary to share video in any format your users wish to consume it in. Hopefully, this clears up the difference between encoding and transcoding.

Before we go, let's throw one more term in there - transmuxing. Try not to confuse transmuxing with encoding and transcoding. Transmuxing is when you change the container for a video instead of the format. It's a way of repackaging a video to make it compatible somewhere without changing what's in the file. This process is faster than encoding or transcoding and takes less computing power because you only change the container, not the file.

It's great when you need to quickly make something available, but the downside is that it doesn't handle things like making multiple video resolutions available. If you choose a container type that's incompatible with your video file, you may also cause compatibility issues, resulting in not being able to play the video. In closing:. Don't hesitate to reach us here or on the community if you have any questions! An end-to-end video API offers the ability to transcode video, deliver it publicly or privately, and play it back with a video player.

Many video APIs also offer the ability to ret Responsive media: the right approach for images is not the right approach for video. The future of [ultra] low-latency video streaming. Top 7 causes of streaming video buffering issues.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000